It is not the first time when it has been said that organic food is not better than food items grown through normal modes of agriculture. Yet again, a new study has taken place and the American Academy of Pediatricians has suggested that there is no nutritional difference when it comes to organic and normal food items.

There are chances that above given claims many be right, it has also been argued that there are some loopholes, which need to be known. Experts were of the view that majorily, the studies are being based on the reviews of previous studies done on the same topic.

There is no problem in carrying out study based on other studies, but it is certainly important to know that who has funded the studies, which are going to act as base for new studies. To cite an example, experts said that Stanford study, which has also affirmed that organic food items are no better than normal food items, was being indirectly funded by the agribusiness industry.

Now, there are a number of researchers, who affirm that more important is that children eat nutritious diet. "There is no direct evidence that consuming an organic diet leads to improved health or lower risk of disease", said the study published in the journal Pediatrics.